home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.personals.ads
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!dv52151
- From: dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (RedSwordTarga)
- Subject: Re: FUCK ALL YOU MARIED DORKS!
- References: <1993Jan21.121204.13007@aston.ac.uk> <lynx.3fd1@terapin.com>
- Message-ID: <C1DFEE.7rL@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 18:30:14 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- lynx@terapin.com (Debbie Caraway) writes:
-
- >Welp, I have to admit I agree with the sentiments completely. I don't know
- >that I have been pushed to use that language. A few months ago, I expressed a
- >similar view in better taste and was flamed by some poly pricker hypocrits.
-
- Just curious, but how were they hypocrites? Hypocrite implies that you say
- one thing and do another.
-
- > At least the guy has some values and some honesty.
- > Tact can be learned. I also
- >wouldn't make assumptions about the person's sex or preference. I have no
- >probs raising a hand in support, since you asked.
-
- No, he has *your* values. The assumption that one has no moral values simply
- because of a non-monogamous relationship with your SO does not hold water.
- Oh, and the question wasn't "Do you support his values?". It was "Does this
- guy sound like an attractive partner?"
-
- Axly
- ********************************************************************************
- * Axly * "Well, yes, I did it... but it's not my fault. " *
- * Red Sword Targa * "Alright, it is my fault... but I'm not responsible." *
- * * "Well, maybe I am responsible..but I'm not to blame." *
- * * "Yes, I am to blame... but they made me do it." *
- * * -Axly *
- ********************************************************************************
-
-