home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!news.Brown.EDU!news.Brown.EDU!news
- From: SL500000@brownvm.brown.edu ()
- Newsgroups: alt.pagan
- Subject: Re: GOD
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:04:21 EST
- Organization: Brown University - Providence, Rhode Island USA
- Lines: 69
- Message-ID: <1k4g0aINN4iq@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
- References: <728022574.0@iphase.fidonet.org> <1k3q16INNl9s@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <C1HDxx.2KK@athena.cs.uga.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: brownvm.brown.edu
- X-News-Software: BNN via BNN_POST v1.0 beta
-
- In article <C1HDxx.2KK@athena.cs.uga.edu>, tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted
- Kalivoda) said:
- >Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
- >References: <728022574.0@iphase.fidonet.org> <1k3q16INNl9s@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
- >Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:49:08 GMT
- >
- >In article <1k3q16INNl9s@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> SL500000@brownvm.brown.edu ()
- >writes:
- >>
- >>> There is a true god. Satan is real. Follow him and you will
- go
- >>>to hell. Follow Jesus and inherite eternal life. Any questions?
- >
- >*ignoring certain replies....
- >
- >>It is very hard to be certain that this is in fact true, since some of
- >>the recorded prophesies of Jesus did *not* come true, and some of his
- >>recorded statements are in logical contradiction with one another, and
- >>thus *cannot* all be true at once.
- >
- >It's good to see someone embracing the law of noncontradiction. I am curious
- >what contradictions in the "sayings" of Jesus do you know as contradictory?
- >There are contradictions between the synoptics, but what precise sayings are
- >in your opinion?
-
- The logical contradiction is between a statement that says "Whoever is
- not for me is against me" and one that says "Whoever is not against me
- is for me." Is further clarification needed?
-
- >Also, if there are sayings of Jesus that are contradictory then why does that
- >mean there is not one true God? I don't see the connection. Perhaps you
- >mean, "follow Jesus and only Jesus and you will inherit eternal life" becomes
- >difficult to accept?
-
- It doesn't mean that there isn't one true God. It means that Jesus'
- words are an unreliable guide to any such God that may exist. No person
- who utters false statements or who utters logically contradictory
- statements is a wholly reliable guide to anything.
-
- >>The plain sense of Mark 13:30 is
- >>that the end of the world will happen before the last person alive in
- >>Jesus' day has died -- but it was not so. There is an irreconcilable
- >>logical contradiction between plain sense of the saying of Jesus
- >>recorded in Matthew 12:30 = Luke 11:23 (He that is not with me is
- >>against me) and Mark 9:40 (For he that is not against us is on our
- >>part). Any questions? -- Robert
- >
- >Yes. Is it not possible that the humanity of Jesus really believed that the
- >world would end in his generation?
-
- The humanity of Jesus is not in dispute here. Of course, any human can
- err, and if Jesus has humanity (as is the traditional Christian teaching),
- then as a human he too can err. This means that his words are not
- wholly reliable.
-
- >Repost the Mark 9:40 with verse 39 and 41 and your tranlated version. There
- >are some interesting diffences in the synoptics and I can't remember if this
- >one really is.
-
- I just grabbed a King James for convenience. Jesus is instructing the
- disciples on a point of correct conduct, and as a *general principle* in
- support of his instruction he then says [my own hasty translation from
- the Greek here]: "for he that is not against [kata] us is with [hyper]
- us." In Matthew and Luke it is rather a general principle which is
- meant rhetorically to reinforce a host of previous statements about
- Jesus' position on the side of God rather than Beelzebub, and it may be
- translated: "He who is not with [meta] me is against [kata] me."
-
- Robert Mathiesen, Brown University, SL500000@BROWNVM
-