home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!farthing
- From: farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf)
- Subject: Re: Verbs and gender connotations
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.035342.25676@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Followup-To: alt.feminism
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- References: <3205@tymix.Tymnet.COM> <1993Jan23.033518.23262@leland.Stanford.EDU> <3227@tymix.Tymnet.COM>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 03:53:42 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <3227@tymix.Tymnet.COM> baba@Tymnet.com (Duane Hentrich) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan23.033518.23262@leland.Stanford.EDU>, farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf) writes:
- >|> In article <3205@tymix.Tymnet.COM> baba@Tymnet.com (Duane Hentrich) writes:
- >|> >I maintain, however, that the cultural connotation to the active verb
- >|> >"to fuck" is masculine.
- >|>
- >|> I'm not sure it is cultural. Although for once, you and Dworkin agree
- >|> on something, since she seems to think it is too.
- >
- >I am curious as to why you say this. I don't believe I've ever mentioned
- >Dworkin or her ideas on the net.
-
- My apologies. I thought you were one of many who have written posts
- that disagree with Dworkin.
-
-