home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13995 talk.politics.misc:70108
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!batcomputer!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!crchh327!n8ppd300!gaj
- From: gaj@n8ppd300.DOMAIN.NOT.SET (Gerald A. Josephson)
- Subject: Re: The hidden costs of Environmentalism : A case study
- Message-ID: <C1ILo2.Mwn@news.rich.bnr.ca>
- Sender: gaj@n8ppd300 (Gerald A. Josephson)
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 13:33:37 GMT
- Lines: 11
- Reply-To: gaj@n8ppd300.DOMAIN.NOT.SET (Gerald A. Josephson)
- References: <C1Hs2M.3DH@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan27.040332.20699@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 131.253.248.119
- Organization: BNR, Inc.
- Keywords: r-12, cars, big bucks
-
-
- In article (Ted Frank) writes:
-
- |>Except it was never a $6 job. It was $6 for the can, and $200+ for the
- |>environmental damage. Just because you didn't have to directly pay for the
-
- Where do you get the $200 figure? I was unaware that some company produced the
- ozone layer and charged everyone for it, or is this another of those instant
- numbers that get thrown around and we are expected to accept as fact?
-
- gaj
-