home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / alt / fan / rushlim / 13903 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-27  |  1.4 KB
  1. Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13903 talk.politics.misc:69945
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!sequent!gaia.ucs.orst.edu!flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU!reed!batcomputer!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!romulus.rutgers.edu!kaldis
  3. From: kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis)
  4. Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
  5. Subject: Re: "Trivial" Felonies (Was: Zoe Baird, Support Her !!!!!!!!!!)
  6. Message-ID: <Jan.26.07.07.02.1993.7530@romulus.rutgers.edu>
  7. Date: 26 Jan 93 12:07:03 GMT
  8. References: <93022.001903KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> <93022.034317MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> <ATAYLOR.93Jan24152617@gauss.nmsu.edu>
  9. Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
  10. Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
  11. Lines: 18
  12.  
  13. In article <ATAYLOR.93Jan24152617@gauss.nmsu.edu> ataylor@nmsu.edu (Nosy) writes:
  14.  
  15. > Mark Sachs:
  16.  
  17. >> I say that by Zoe Baird withdrawing we have the right thing but for
  18. >> the wrong reasons.  The immigration law stuff is wrong, true, but
  19. >> fairly trivial.
  20.  
  21. > Thanks for this assertion, Sachs. I was unaware that Federal FELONIES
  22. > were "fairly trivial".
  23.  
  24. [Not to defend Zoe Baird, but] according to what I heard, Baird's
  25. violations were only misdemeanors.
  26. -- 
  27. The views expressed herein are   ||  Theodore A. Kaldis
  28. my own only.  Do you seriously   ||  kaldis@remus.rutgers.edu
  29. believe that a major university  ||  {...}!rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!kaldis
  30. as this would hold such views??? ||
  31.