home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13767 talk.politics.misc:69627 talk.abortion:57806
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!wetware!drieux
- From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
- Subject: Speaking of Legal Personality
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.073851.17560@wetware.com>
- Sender: news@wetware.com (Usenet News Account)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: vladimir
- Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
- References: <1993Jan23.4673.12532@dosgate>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 07:38:51 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- "david meadows" <david.meadows@canrem.com> writes:
- ]
- ] TF>"Legal personality in the womb" is neither equivalent to nor does it
- ] >inextricably lead to "abortion is always illegal."
- ]
- ] So you agree that there is such a thing as legal personality in the
- ] womb. If that is the case, that legal personality is protected by
- ] whatever rights he or she would have outside the womb and so neither
- ] you, nor the mother, nor anyone else has a right to deprive it of life
- ] without due process of law.
-
- Minor Point here: but corporations are legal persons,
- does this mean that "Corporate Raiders" are actually
- LIABLE FOR MURDER when they gut and run?
-
- Just wanted to see how we are going to handle
- the matter of dealing with 'legal person.'
-
-
- ciao
- drieux
-
- ps: HUM... might be an improvement to kapitalism....
-
-
-
- --
- MajorModernDayProblems:
-
- "If you will not talk with Yourself,
- Why should anyone else?"
-