home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13630 misc.legal:23193 talk.abortion:57577
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!dpollard
- From: dpollard@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dennis B Pollard)
- Subject: Re: Fetal Rights of Inheritance
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.223910.20003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bottom.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Organization: The Ohio State University
- References: <1993Jan22.4673.12392@dosgate> <1993Jan22.211145.24668@midway.uchic
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:39:10 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1993Jan22.211145.24668@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@midway.uchicago.ed
- u writes:
- >In article <1993Jan22.4673.12392@dosgate> "david meadows" <david.meadows@canre
- m.com> writes:
- >
- >"Legal personality in the womb" is neither equivalent to nor does it
- >inextricably lead to "abortion is always illegal." An "unborn widow"
- >that has never been nor never will be conceived is also a "legal
- >personality" in similar circumstances, but I doubt we'd want a legal
- >regime that worries more about fertile octagenarians than it already
- >does.
-
- Ah, Mr. Frank brings back my favorite law school subject. Actually, I enjoyed
- the Rule Against Perpetuities, abolished by statute in CA, because the CA
- Legislature thought that it was too difficult to learn.
-
- Of course the CA Legislature did not receive instruction from Prof. Chow,
- Property Master. Of course, I owe tribute to Prof. Dukeminer as well.
-