home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13544 talk.politics.misc:69317
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!kel111
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:01:51 EST
- From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Message-ID: <93022.170151KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re: Zoe Baird, Support Her !!!!!!!!!!
- References: <93022.001903KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- <1993Jan22.174046.17956@cbnewsc.cb.att.com>
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1993Jan22.174046.17956@cbnewsc.cb.att.com>,
- bermes@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Terry Bermes) says:
-
- >> I think (as one of Rush's callers theorized) that Clinton -knew- that Baird
- >> would not get confirmed. He wanted to make a pretense of wanting some
- >> conservatism in the cabinet, so people wouldn't think he was a liberal. He
- >> never intended for someone like Zoe Baird to be attorney general. He just
- >> wants you to think he did. Ingenious little ploy of his.
-
- > Hmmm, in a single paragraph, you went from a rush-droid's speculation
- >of a Clinton tactic to assuming it's fact. This certainly adds credibility
-
- I did no such thing. It's called 'speculation.' ...for crying out loud.
-
- >to the anti-Clinton side. Is it even remotely possible that Clinton truly
- >wanted Baird as AG? Nah! There's got to some conspiracy to fool the public
-
- Geez, I come up with a theory (which I think could be true), and everyone
- starts calling me paranoid! Why are you all so defensive? Were you all in
- on it??? ;-)
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Kurt E. Ludwick | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
- - - - - - - - -|
- kel111@psuvm.psu.edu | what's the opposite of Progress...?
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-