home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13419 talk.politics.misc:69101
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!kel111
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:35:35 EST
- From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Message-ID: <93021.213535KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re: What will Bush and Quayle do now?
- References: <21JAN199313051967@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> <C182Ez.7ns@cup.hp.com>
- <15590.2b5ee646@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <15590.2b5ee646@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>,
- vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu says:
-
- >But won't that be a violation of her "essential nature as a woman"? I thought
- >she gave up her career for her family? Is there a contradiction here? Or is
- >it now that since Dan is unemployable, that she has to be a working mother?
-
- What the heck are you talking about?
-
- I'm tired of people claiming Marilyn Quayle attacked working mothers...
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Kurt E. Ludwick | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
- - - - - - - - -|
- kel111@psuvm.psu.edu | what's the opposite of Progress...?
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-