home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13281 alt.politics.bush:16171 alt.politics.clinton:20739
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!raistlin!timbuk.cray.com!walter.cray.com!matt
- From: matt@cray.com (Matthew Marchese)
- Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.032248.884@walter.cray.com>
- Lines: 28
- Nntp-Posting-Host: techops.cray.com
- Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
- References: <C11nEF.KGI@unix.amherst.edu> <gPkmXB3w165w@major.panix.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 03:22:47 CST
-
- In article <gPkmXB3w165w@major.panix.com> dos@major.panix.com (Dave O'Shea) writes:
- >twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
- >
- >> In article <1993Jan14.210240.1902@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galile
- >>
- >> >This assumes that homosexuality is a natural sexual nature. I do not conced
- >> >this point.
- >>
- >> Then don't raise it. The "natural" argument is a strawman.
- >
- >I actually find the "natural" argument rather amusing. The most common
- >version of it is "animals don't do it, so...".. I can only assume that
- >since dogs lick their balls in public, it must be acceptable for people
- >to do similarly.
- >
- >
- Well, you know the old joke; most of us would do it if we could
- only reach...:)
-
- *******************************************************************************
- * "Supernatural perhaps...Baloney, perhaps not!" - Bela Lugosi *
- *******************************************************************************
- Matt Marchese The opinions expressed here are not those of my employer, *
- Cray Research my wife, my church, or myself...But they are the opinions *
- DKRZ of Elvis as revealed to me through the medium of my pet *
- Hamburg, Germany hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald... *
- *******************************************************************************
-
-