home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / alt / fan / renand / 614 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-27  |  1.2 KB

  1. Xref: sparky alt.fan.ren-and-stimpy:614 alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy:5232
  2. Newsgroups: alt.fan.ren-and-stimpy,alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wmu-coyote!ochs
  4. From: ochs@sol.cs.wmich.edu (Fred Ochs)
  5. Subject: Re: Why?
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan27.071134.2324@sol.cs.wmich.edu>
  7. Organization: Western Michigan Univ. Comp. Sci. Dept.
  8. References: <C19G98.EE1@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <ghosty.3gu1@terapin.com> <C1H1Mr.ItA@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
  9. Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 07:11:34 GMT
  10. Lines: 18
  11.  
  12. In article <C1H1Mr.ItA@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Thumper) writes:
  13. > In <ghosty.3gu1@terapin.com> ghosty@terapin.com (Noah Hanna) writes:
  14. > >Ha, havent you gotten the Email saying that this group is considered
  15. > >unneccessary and isn't widely considered valid by the Net community (or
  16. > >something like that)? Personally I think that it's perfectly fitting
  17. > >considering Ren and Stimpy, (anarchy in the Usenet!!!).
  18. > Its not like I was suggesting that it get rmgrouped. I was just curious to
  19. > know the excuse for making me read 2 Ren and Stimpy groups instead of just
  20. > one.
  21. > Anarchy in AltNet!
  22. HEY! be glad you get both of them. I don't get alt.fan.ren-and-stimpy
  23. here :(
  24.  
  25. Fred
  26.