home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!tom
- Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
- Date: Wednesday, 27 Jan 1993 12:15:39 PST
- From: <TOM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
- Message-ID: <93027.121539TOM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.james-bond
- Subject: Re: Movie Chronology
- References: <1993Jan25.013537.19769@husc3.harvard.edu>
- <C1ItEn.92I@bailgate.gpsemi.com> <colinm.728160107@cunews>
- Lines: 7
-
- I don't think it was Moores' fault for his poor acting! You can blame it on
- the director and the 70s' and 80s', and Sean Connery which all 007s will be
- be judged. In the 80s, the public wanted a "Moore Jet set type Bond" with all
- that Moonraker type shit until they realized that fools they were making
- of themselves and returned to the more conserative type Bond in "Never say
- Never Again".
- -tom
-