home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uunet.ca!hombas!michael.armstrong
- From: michael.armstrong@homebase.com (Michael Armstrong)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.furry
- Subject: Re: FUR-losophy
- Message-ID: <600.472.uupcb@homebase.com>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 00:16:00 GMT
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Home Base BBS - St. Thomas, Ontario - 519-633-7253
- Reply-To: michael.armstrong@homebase.com (Michael Armstrong)
- Lines: 18
-
- From: michael.armstrong@homebase.com (Michael Armstrong)
-
- Gr> I think that Maus was more a sterotype of the relationship between
-
- MA>> Brits? Fish? Maybe Monty Python. :) You forget Brits are typecast as
- >> old British Bull Dog. This opens a whole new anthropomorphic metaphor
-
- Gr>Typecast where? I've only read Maus II. All I know is that the Americans w
- >shown as dogs.
-
- I've actually only just looked at both books and haven't picked up
- either. :( I only going with the cat & mouse idea since it's an obvious
- and perfect metaphor to use for that type of story.
-
- ---mike---
- ---
- . SLMR 2.1a . If a C-130 can fly, why can't a penguin?
-
-