home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!decwrl!csus.edu!sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu!vpcsc11
- From: vpcsc11@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu (student)
- Newsgroups: alt.desert-storm
- Subject: Re: no-flyzone
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.175109.12170@csus.edu>
- Date: 28 Jan 93 17:51:09 GMT
- References: <1k6n19INNq6k@transfer.stratus.com> <1993Jan27.232327.7899@csus.edu> <1k7n0lINNapn@transfer.stratus.com>
- Sender: news@csus.edu
- Organization: San Francisco State University
- Lines: 14
-
- In a previous article, Dan-King-Of-The-Ad-Hominim-Attack-Swartzendruber
- responds to the argument that US attacks were not justified by the
- UN resolutions by saying:
-
- >
- >So it's up to us to decide how to enforce it? Doesn't sound very
- >illegal to me. So amartin can spell, and you can't apply basic
- >logic. Hmmmm, seems like a tough choice.
- >
-
- I don't know Dan. Let's apply your logic to another situation in
- the Middle East. If Iraq decided to lob a few SCUDS at Israel to
- "enforce" the recent UN resolutions concerning the deported
- Palestinians, would you consider this to be illegal?
-