home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3524 soc.men:23322 soc.women:23097 misc.legal:23381
- Path: sparky!uunet!sequent!gaia.ucs.orst.edu!flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU!reed!batcomputer!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!pagesat!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!ellis!thf2
- From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
- Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,soc.men,soc.women,misc.legal
- Subject: Re: Sexual Discrimination
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.145634.21622@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 14:56:34 GMT
- References: <1993Jan26.011724.27341@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> <1993Jan26.035102.3766@midway.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan26.085757.6320@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1993Jan26.085757.6320@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> noraa@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (aaron.l.hoffmeyer) writes:
- >Given that women are awarded either sole custody or primary custody
- >(usually something like a 75/25 split) in roughly 85% of all divorces
- >in this country in which the divorcing couple are parents of children
- >under age eighteen, despite laws in virtually every state that
- >emphatically set forth that judges should NOT be biased by gender in
- >awarding said custody of children, are the judges and referees of the
- >domestic relations courts of the United States of America guilty of
- >sexual discrimination?
-
- Not necessarily. Equal opportunity does not equal equal outcome.
- I see no evidence that parental litigants are, on average, similarly
- situated so that one would expect a 50/50 split. Furthermore, family
- law I have seen, whenever there is disparate treatment, benefits men
- at the expense of women. For all I know, women should be receiving
- custody 92% of the time instead of 85% of the time.
- --
- ted frank | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu
- standard disclaimers | void where prohibited
- the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
-