home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!unipalm!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!library
- From: library@comlab.ox.ac.uk (Gordon Riddell)
- Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,uk.politics
- Subject: Re: Norman Lamont, his flexible friend, and Miss Whiplash
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.102701.9700@merlin.comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 10:27:01 GMT
- References: <53wmXB4w165w@mantis.co.uk> <930120.155234.5Y8.rusnews.w165w@mantis.co.uk>
- Distribution: uk
- Organization: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK
- Lines: 25
- Originator: library@merlin.comlab
-
- In article <930120.155234.5Y8.rusnews.w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
- >
- >But interestingly, Ms St Clair recently claimed (according to Ceefax) that
- >she had a "dirt file" detailing famous people who have been clients of
- >prostitutes, and that she was prepared to reveal this information to protest
- >about a huge tax bill she had been sent.
- >
- >And now she's missing. It all sounds very odd. Does anyone know what's going
- >on?
-
-
- Yes, Normie's Miss Whiplash is a different one to Lindi St. Clair. I once read
- part of her "autobiography" (someone donated it as a raffle prize for a raffle
- I was organising!) and she went on at length, so to speak, about the MPs and
- Cabinet ministers and Peers who availed themselves of her services. She did
- say she'd never reveal who her little darlings were. However it is
- the Inland Revenue who wish to grab a great deal of back tax (yes, on her
- immoral earnings). I'd bet she's done a bunk even though she did threaten
- to grass.
-
- It does strike me as contradictory that someone can legally not earn money
- from
- prostitution, but when they do they have to pay tax on it!
-
- Gordon
-