home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.amateur-comp:666 comp.edu:2378 soc.culture.usa:10134 alt.activism:21412
- Path: sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news.cerf.net!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!cgl!rothko.mmwb.ucsf.edu!shauna
- From: shauna@rothko.mmwb.ucsf.edu (Shauna Farr-Jones)
- Newsgroups: alt.amateur-comp,comp.edu,soc.culture.usa,alt.activism
- Subject: Re: Email sent to Congress - then stopped (Was Re: Internet Access...)
- Message-ID: <shauna.728075883@rothko.mmwb.ucsf.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 19:18:03 GMT
- References: <1jslhnINNncl@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> <1k2cb4INNhgf@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> <C1Go4B.n11@ais.org>
- Sender: news@cgl.ucsf.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab
- Lines: 24
-
- danr@ais.org (Daniel Romanchik) writes:
-
- >In article <1k2cb4INNhgf@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> ronda@ais.org (Ronda Hauben) writes:
- >>ronda@ais.org responding:
- >>
- >>I do agree that we should have email access to Congress,
- >>but I don't agree that Congress is denying us this access
- >>because of some computer illiteracy on their part.
- >>
- >>Rather, they are constituent illiterate - i.e. they have
- >>no respect for the experiences and wishes of their
- >>constituents - they have taken their offices as license
- >>for privilege and for serving those who pay them well in
- >>exchange.
- >>
-
- > No amount of e-mail access is going to change that. The only way
- >you're going to get their attention is by working for their political
- >defeat in the next election.
-
- >Dan
-
- what makes you think that the people who replace them aregoing
- to be any different????
-