home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!batcomputer!caen!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!netnews
- From: nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson)
- Subject: Re: Give Me A Break!
- Sender: usenet@apollo.hp.com (Usenet News)
- Message-ID: <C1IoxL.J4x@apollo.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:44:09 GMT
- References: <1993Jan26.145958.1@ccsua.ctstateu.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: c.ch.apollo.hp.com
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA
- Lines: 63
-
- In article <1993Jan26.145958.1@ccsua.ctstateu.edu> parys@ccsua.ctstateu.edu writes:
- >About six months ago this was an interesting newsgroup. Now it consists of
- >science fiction and egos.
-
- This has NEVER been an interesting newsgroup! All it consist of are
- people making wild, unsubstantiated claims about UFO's, alien abductions,
- and government conspiracies to hide alien contact, and other people
- like me damanding *decent evidence* for this stuff rather than
- speculation. And never getting such evidence.
-
-
- >The possiblility that there could be life on another planet is not one that any
- >of us would view as impossible.
- >
- >That they could travel here and watch us and want to examine us is also not
- >impossible.
-
- It's not impossible that someone has built a 120 story skyscraper in
- the middle of an Iowa cornfield. It's not impossible that my mother
- had 8 children (my father had 8 children). It's not impossible that
- I could be wearing grey dress slacks right now. Many things are
- not impossible. But this is no indication whatsoever that they
- are true.
-
- >And what could Star Trek, this generation or the last, possibly have to do with
- >the purpose of this group?
-
- Beats me. The STNG debates got crossposted to sci.skeptic, too. On
- both newsgroups I had also made comments and raised issues MUCH more
- relevant to the stated purpose of the newsgroup and got almost no
- responses, whereas I got LOTS of reaction to the TV comments.
-
-
- >This is supposed to be about REAL ENCOUNTERS not encounters with a televison
- >set.
-
- I think a lot of people who watch a lot of TV can't tell the difference.
- They think if they saw something on TV or heard a CNN reporter say it
- was true, it must be! _TV Guide_, of all places, had an article about
- a year ago on how the televised testimony of some Kuwaiti refugees
- just before the Gulf War in 1991 was a major factor in whipping up
- war frenzy, and building up sympathy for Kuwait in the US. Only
- problem was that the tretimony, according to the magazine, was a
- fabrication.
-
- I can't vouch for whether it really was a fabrication, but I certainly
- have seen MANY things on network news that were either factually wrong
- or deliberate lies (take your pick). And several studies have found
- that frequent TV viewers are more likely to perceive the world as a
- dangerous place and have an exaggerated sense of the likelihood of
- themselves being a crime victim than non-TV-viewers. So I'm not sure
- that frequent TV watchers DO have the powers of discrimination you
- ask for. I think if they saw a news report about UFO abductions or
- something they WOULD think that UFO abductions were real.
-
-
-
- ---peter
-
-
-
-
-
-