home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!mausoof
- From: mausoof@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
- Subject: RE: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.153917.46750@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 15:39:16 CST
- Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
- Lines: 14
-
- In this ongoing debate over the quality of programs on networks, I have
- to agree with all and differ with none. But still I have to post, here are my
- reasons for not being addicted to Star Trek.
- 1) The story starts expanding slowly and by the last ten minutes it has become
- rather interesting(sometimes). Voila, someone comes up with a brilliant
- solution, presses afew buttons and the show is over.
- 2) All the aliens are humanoids, why do they have to have two legs and two arms
- and shit on their face.
- 3) Picard trys to hard to be Sean Connery.
- 4) No real suspense, it has just become a sort of noveaux techno sort of think.
- I watch Start Trek. Therefore, I must be smart.
- But I admit that sometimes they explore issues with a lot more insight,
- and the graphics are pretty good to. Most of my freinds are Trekkies, but I
- would rather watch Batman The Animated Series. Now that is pure entertainement.
-