home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!att-out!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!dropout.rutgers.edu!mcgrew
- From: mcgrew@dropout.rutgers.edu (Charles Mcgrew)
- Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
- Subject: Re: Roswell Testimony
- Message-ID: <Jan.21.21.01.06.1993.3036@dropout.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 02:01:07 GMT
- References: <memo.875023@cix.compulink.co.uk> <C14JM6.68v@apollo.hp.com> <C14yvp.E0A@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1993Jan20.070944.23587@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 28
-
-
- unglenie@ford.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert J Unglenieks) writes:
- Let's say they were testing MANNED balloons as a recon
- platform or to set an altitude record and something went wrong
- and the crew was killed. It would be very embarrassing public
- relations-wise if this go out. This sounds like a plausible
- reason for secrecy.
-
- ... not really. Manned balloons (as opposed to rigid airships) were
- used in the years before WWII for research, as part of a joint
- USAAC/National Geographic project (Explorer II reached 72,395 feet in
- 1935, for instance). Balloon experiments continued after WWII (in
- 1960, for instance, Captain Joseph Kittinger *jumped* from a balloon
- (with a parachute) from 102,800 feet as part of the aptly-named "Man
- High" program). The problem, for your assertion, is that we know
- about all this (we also know about 'skyhook', and the CIA's
- balloon-reconaissance program.) (I am also fairly certain that the
- balloon program had casualties, but cannot be sure with the references
- I have to hand.)
-
- If the military were going to keep such things secret, would they
- not have kept other such embarrasing things secret, like the YB-49
- crash in June, 1948 (that killed Frank Edwards and 4 others)?
-
- Charles
-
- Source: Historical Dictionary of the US Air Force, Charles Bright,
- ed., Discover Channel documentary, "The Wing will Fly".
-