home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!cory.Berkeley.EDU!keithk
- From: keithk@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Krueger)
- Newsgroups: alt.activism.d
- Subject: Re: Call For Discussion - unmoderating misc.activism.progressive
- Date: 23 Jan 1993 22:36:38 GMT
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <1jsh9m$h9a@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <1993Jan22.022307.27241@mont.cs.missouri.edu> <1993Jan22.152141.6733@desire.wright.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cory.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan22.152141.6733@desire.wright.edu> demon@desire.wright.edu (Not a Boomer) writes:
- >> Therefore, I think that misc.activism.progressive should be unmoderated.
- >
- >Go for it. Of course you'll need to find 2000 yes votes to counter-act
- >the 700 canned votes mustered from ACTIV-L and associated lists where people
- >know nothing of Usenet.
- >
- >Brett
-
- Usenet Brett, will you teach those poor ACTIV-L people about news groups?
- It's really too bad that they're so dumb. Maybe if they read some of
- your fine generalizations, they wouldn't be lost in the darkness of
- their "radical" views and could even comprehend USENET. Boy, that
- would be a wonderful day! God bless you, Brett! Enlighten us.
-
- -Keith
-
-