home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.philosophy.misc:3181 gnu.misc.discuss:4253 alt.usage.english:10307 alt.society.anarchy:1041
- Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc,gnu.misc.discuss,alt.usage.english,alt.society.anarchy
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!peruvian.cs.utah.edu!galt
- From: galt%peruvian.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Greg Alt)
- Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF
- Date: 6 Jan 93 13:21:20 MST
- Message-ID: <1993Jan6.132121.13286@hellgate.utah.edu>
- Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss,alt.society.anarchy
- Sender: galt@peruvian.utah.edu (Greg Alt)
- Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
- References: <2B4854DE.5F42@tct.com> <1993Jan5.090712.9584@uwasa.fi> <2B49ED1A.7405@tct.com>
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <2B49ED1A.7405@tct.com> chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
- >Were X to have been a GPL product from the beginning, the public
- >minded people who do contribute fixes would have continued to do so.
- >The only difference would be a loss: commercial products would never
- >have been, since GPL programs just don't provide the revenue stream.
-
- That isn't necessarily true... Companies that produce hardware would
- still try to make X work better on their systems to increase hardware
- sales.
-
- But it is true that there would be less commercial products.
- ----
- Join the Greg Alt boycott! Put /galt/h :j in your killfile today!
- ----
-