home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:55387 talk.religion.misc:25959 alt.atheism:25785
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism
- Subject: Re: Christian Pro-Choicers
- Message-ID: <1iuuq9INNigg@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 17:23:21 GMT
- References: <C0pAqt.Jr@athena.cs.uga.edu> <1993Jan12.021048.2261@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <C0q3oG.KJz@athena.cs.uga.edu>
- Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
- Lines: 20
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com
-
- In article <C0q3oG.KJz@athena.cs.uga.edu> hudson@athena.cs.uga.edu (Paul Hudson Jr) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan12.021048.2261@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >>Nonsense. She has a fetus removed from her body. That it dies is
- >>simply a fact of it's inability to survive as anything other than a
- >>parasite, at this stage.
- >How many abortions are performed simply by removing the child from the womb
- >without harming it? What about "vaccumming" and saline abortions?
-
- Dunno. How bout you tell us how many abortions (up to, say, 2 million, to
- give us a margin, per year) would be AOK with you if they were performed
- in the mere 'removal' manner?
-
- >Requiring the use of the body need not require blood/tissue/organs.
-
- Not only "need not" but quite clearly DOES not. There is no law in this
- land that REQUIRES a father to give a perfect-tissue-match kidney to his
- ailing child. Yet some would have a law that requires a woman to give
- her womb to a perhaps/maybe/potential child.....
-
- Adrienne Regard
-