home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!wri!joplin.wri.com!markp
- From: markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs)
- Subject: Re: Who are you guys?
- Message-ID: <markp.726771195@joplin.wri.com>
- Sender: news@wri.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: joplin.wri.com
- Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
- References: <1992Dec29.235055.18645@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <markp.725731241@dragonfly.wri.com> <1993Jan8.164325.8820@advtech.uswest.com> <markp.726528552@spider.wri.com> <1l_3zzr@rpi.edu> <markp.726677398@spider.wri.com> <PATRICK.93Jan10095527@rio-grande.is.rice.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 16:53:15 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In <PATRICK.93Jan10095527@rio-grande.is.rice.edu> patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
-
- >On Sun, 10 Jan 1993 14:49:58 GMT, markp@spider.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) said:
-
- >>Why do people who don't believe in absolute ethical standards
- >>get involved in debates over ethical standards? Isn't it either
- >>pointless or self-contradictory?
-
- >It's almost as pointless as those who *do* believe in absolute ethics trying
- >to impose them upon those who don't...
-
- By definition, absolute ethics apply to everyone. (You seem to
- think, "Don't impose your ethics on others" applies to everyone -- you
- coercive fascist, you!)
-
- >--PLH, never miss a straight line
- (or think in a straight line :-) )
-
- Mark Pundurs
-