home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:55108 talk.religion.misc:25782 alt.atheism:25624
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!seismo!lll-winken!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!nocsun.NOC.Vitalink.COM!wetware!drieux
- From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism
- Subject: Why are You folks Denigrating Christ?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan11.085356.14697@wetware.com>
- Date: 11 Jan 93 08:53:56 GMT
- References: <1993Jan9.063657.20201@noao.edu> <1993Jan9.074243.9436@netcom.com> <1993Jan9.163519.5896@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: news@wetware.com (Usenet News Account)
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
- Lines: 55
- Nntp-Posting-Host: vladimir
-
- dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- ] In article <1993Jan9.074243.9436@netcom.com>
- ] ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
- ] >forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- ]
- ] >> I demonstrated that it is absurd to think that Christ himself would assist
- ] >> in any abortion. Instead He would provide for the needs of both the mother
- ] >> and the child. Which btw is just what a great many pro-lifers are doing.
- ]
- ] > While Christ would probably not assist in any abortion, nobody is
- ] > suggesting that _any_ Christian be required to do so.
- ]
- ] Some people are suggesting that Christians should be required
- ] to assist in abortions. The Freedom of Choice Act, which Congress
- ] is planning to consider soon, contains no conscience clause which
- ] would protect hospital employees from facing punishment for refusing
- ] to assist in an abortion procedure. And Bill Clinton has said that
- ] he would have no objections to using federal tax dollars to pay for
- ] elective abortions.
-
- Doug, I think that you should SERIOUSLY talk to Susan,
- as she seem to be of the Opinion that Christ is NOT
- a Part of the Trinity and Oneness of God!
-
- If She presumes that the minor matter of Numbers 5 is
- not to be taken literally, then I can see how she can
- presume that God does NOT involve himself in abortions.
-
- Then Again, this also would get her off the hook on a
- lot of other things..... but at that point why not just
- say that she believes in some GodUnit not related to the
- bible?????
-
- Now on the Other Hand if she is Talking about the God of the
- Bible, then She must go back to the Minor Matter of Numbers 5,
- and Deal with Why she is Alienating Christ from God.
-
- You Really Have to stay Abreast of which Christina Bashers
- you wish to defend and which you wish to let run loose
- Raising Holy Hell....
-
- ciao
- drieux
-
-
- ps: as for your matter on the FOCA, so?
-
-
-
- --
- MajorModernDayProblems: "Olivia Newton-John is the grand-daughter
- of Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Edmund Newton-John." --Frank
-
- Clear Proof Of Genetic Superiority, eh No????
-