home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:54909 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:12084 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show:105
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: Spoken Like a True ProLifer
- Message-ID: <1993Jan9.224959.13742@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <6JAN93.14152728@vax.clarku.edu> <1993Jan7.021929.9924@crd.ge.com> <7JAN93.14442151@vax.clarku.edu>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 22:49:59 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- Darcy> It is far more realistic to subsidize abortion, maybe even to
- Darcy> incentivize it, than to rely on people "controlling their hormones",
- Darcy> and it achieves the same economic result, i.e. reduction of the birth
- Darcy> rate among poor people.
-
- Simmonds> Ahh.. I see. You don't think poor people are capable of making
- Simmonds> intelligent decisions by themselves. You want to make sure you
- Simmonds> hold their hand since you are so superior.
-
- Sims> You seem to think that female people are incapable
- Sims> of making intelligent decisions by themselves.
- Sims> You want to make sure you decide for them whether or
- Sims> not they stay pregnant because you think your
- Sims> views are so superior.
-
- Keegan> people have been criticizing kebbie for that for
- Keegan> years. it's one of the reasons he has been referred
- Keegan> to as a "pro-forcer."
-
- Sims> Actually, I wrote this in response to Edward Simmonds, who wrote
- Sims> something similar in response to Kevin.
-
- Thanks for the correction, Heather. Keegan seems to be losing it.
-
- - Kevin
-