home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!usenet
- From: lebow@psl.nrl.navy.mil
- Subject: Re: Abortion, Caves, Galen (WAS Vegetarianism and abortion)
- Message-ID: <C0KC4u.13L@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil
- Organization: NRL
- References: <C01JMJ.Jt@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <30DEC92.15120932@vax.clarku.edu> <markp.725732494@dragonfly.wri.com> <1ifvijINNpia@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 01:29:17 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1ifvijINNpia@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne
- Regard) writes:
- >In article <markp.725732494@dragonfly.wri.com> markp@dragonfly.wri.com (Mark
- Pundurs) writes:
- >>In <30DEC92.15120932@vax.clarku.edu> hsims@vax.clarku.edu writes:
- >>
- >>>Why do you feel pregnant women should not have a
- >>>right to refuse to have their bodies used to support a fetus?
- >>
- >>A woman has the right to avoid conception. Once her voluntary actions
- >>have created a human being and placed that human in a position of
- >>dependency, she has obligated herself to act in accord with that human's
- >>right to life.
- >
-
- I am totally confused by your use of the word "voluntary". What does the
- intent of the parents have to do with the humans right to life?
-
-
- - Paul
-