home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:54747 alt.abortion.inequity:6348 alt.politics.usa.constitution:1408
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.politics.usa.constitution
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!concert!rock!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
- From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Subject: Re: Basis for Roe Decision
- Message-ID: <1993Jan9.001223.11039@ncsu.edu>
- Followup-To: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- References: <1992Dec29.182641.22268@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan6.060819.22850@midway.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan7.024809.22609@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan8.151835.18395@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 00:12:23 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <1993Jan8.151835.18395@midway.uchicago.edu>
- thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> So what do you call child support laws, if not burdening men
- >> in a way that women aren't?
-
- > I'm sorry, I'm unaware of a child support law that distinguishes
- > between men and women, rather than custodial parents and non-
- > custodial parents.
-
- Neither child support laws nor anti-abortion laws are intended to
- burden one sex more than another, but they both have that effect.
- If I'm not mistaken, you stated that a law which has the effect
- of burdening one segment of society is not necessarily unconstitutional.
-
- >> And how does it follow that every type of abortion restriction,
- >> including waiting periods, informed consent provisions, and
- >> late-term restrictions, will result in the subjugation of
- >> women?
-
- > Take it up with Tribe. It's not my argument.
-
- Well, you seemed to have no difficulty defending his argument
- up until now.
-
-
- >ted frank
-
-
- Doug Holtsinger
-
-