home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!boulder!csn!cherokee!steven
- From: steven@advtech.uswest.com ( Steve Novak)
- Subject: Doug's Unrestricted Claim Disproved By...DOUG!!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.233803.15340@advtech.uswest.com>
- Sender: news@advtech.uswest.com (Radio Free Boulder)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: jaynes.advtech.uswest.com
- Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
- References: <C0G8oI.6E1@athena.cs.uga.edu> <1993Jan7.045542.6022@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1993Jan7.195857.26337@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:38:03 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- > = (Doug "Christian Atheist" Holtsinger) writes:
- >> = wendymas@gnu (hell here) wrote:
-
- >> once again, i feel i must correct something which is seriously amiss.
- >> the claim was made that Roe v Wade allowed abortions up until the 9th month.
-
- >This claim is correct; Roe v. Wade is unrestricted abortion-on-demand
- >all the way up to the point of birth. Under Roe, the states are
- >prevented from restricting third-trimester abortions performed for
- >broadly defined ``health'' reasons, including emotional and psychological
- >health.
-
- Doug, you lying weirdo: if abortions are allowed in the third-trimester
- for "broadly defined 'health' reasons" then, of course, RvW is not
- unrestricted.
-
- Boy, you just keep sticking your lead head into the paddle wheel, son.
- Won't you ever learn?
-
- Now, since your premise is dead wrong (as usual), apologize to "wendy"
- and go shine Chaney's shoes again.
-
- [rest of post, obviously flawed, not needed...]
-
-
-
- --
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Steve Novak | |"Wacker the K"|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- steven@advtech.USWest.Com
-