home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!forgach
- From: forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
- Subject: Re: An argument for better sex ed
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.233019.7218@noao.edu>
- Originator: forgach@gemini.tuc.noao.edu
- Sender: news@noao.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gemini.tuc.noao.edu
- Organization: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, USA
- References: <1993Jan7.041120.13967@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:30:19 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- From article by gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga):
- >> patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
- >>> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- >>From article by sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin):
- >>>In article vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes
- >>>
- >>>>I don't think you understand... you got YOURSELF pregnant.
- >>>
- >>> Nice trick, Heather.
- >>
- >>Seems to me any time a pro-lifer brings up the fact that it takes two
- >>to get pregnant, he or she gets barraged with followups and letters
- >>from lesbians espousing the "teaspoon method".
- >>
- >>Ya can't have it both ways, pro-"choicers".
- >>
- >>How is pointing out the obvious idiocy of a statement made by one of your
- >>fellow travelers trying to "have it both ways"? Or are you saying you
- >>really think Heather got herself pregnant? (That *is* a neat trick, if she
- >>really did that.)
- >
- > Maybe Heather was visited by an angel, and when told she would be pregnant
- > by a god she shouted "YES!" Whatya think, Suzanne?
-
- Mmmmmm, Could be. Could be. But in this day and age the other way is much
- more common.
-
-
- > Gordon
-
- Suzanne.
-