home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:54429 alt.abortion.inequity:6327 alt.politics.usa.constitution:1394
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!concert!rock!taco!eceyv.ncsu.edu!dsh
- From: dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.politics.usa.constitution
- Subject: Re: Basis for Roe Decision
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.024809.22609@ncsu.edu>
- Date: 7 Jan 93 02:48:09 GMT
- References: <1992Dec23.171241.7353@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Dec29.182641.22268@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan6.060819.22850@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Followup-To: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Distribution: na
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <1993Jan6.060819.22850@midway.uchicago.edu>
- thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-
- >> This is the first I've heard of Equal
- >> Protection being applied to the abortion issue.
-
- > The EP argument is one of sex discrimination.
- > [...]
- > The argument is a standard restricting-abortion-results-in-the-subjugation-
- > of-women-in-a-male-dominated-society-by-burdening-them-in-a-way-that-men-
- > aren't-burdened one, which I trust you can fill in the outlines of.
-
- So what do you call child support laws, if not burdening men
- in a way that women aren't? Most people do accept the unequal
- burden placed on men by child support laws, without any second
- thoughts.
-
- If we accept the premise that the sexes should not be burdened
- unequally, how does it follow that permissive abortion laws
- are the *only* possible means for women to achieve equality?
-
- And how does it follow that every type of abortion restriction,
- including waiting periods, informed consent provisions, and
- late-term restrictions, will result in the subjugation of
- women?
-
-
- >ted frank
-
-
- Doug Holtsinger
-