home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Who are you guys?
- Date: 6 Jan 1993 17:08:24 -0800
- Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
- Lines: 26
- Message-ID: <1ifvq8INNpk3@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- References: <1992Dec29.235055.18645@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <markp.725731241@dragonfly.wri.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com
-
- In article <markp.725731241@dragonfly.wri.com> markp@dragonfly.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) writes:
-
- >In cases of rape or incest, AND ONLY IN THOSE CASES, the woman was denied her
- >right to choose avoiding pregnancy.
-
- Uh. So the circumstances of the conception itself create the 'right to life',
- eh? Seems pretty weird to me.
-
- I'll bet it you took a look, via sonogram, or laser camera, or even by
- viewing the unfortunate remains of two separate abortions, that you
- couldn't tell which was a fetus with a 'right to life' and which was
- conceived WITHOUT the woman's choice and therefore...somehow....didn't
- have a 'right to life'.
-
- How you gonna tell?
-
- >(The most fundamental right being life, she may not choose her
- >economic or career security over the baby's right to life.)
-
-
- why not? Seems to me you can choose your economic or career security
- over the right of someone else to have your kidneys for transplant.
- What's the essential difference?
-
- Adrienne Regard
-
-