NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1/NN_1993_1.iso/spool/talk/abortion/54383

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-06 | 2.9 KB

Xref: sparky talk.abortion:54383 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11751 alt.rush-limbaugh:13169 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show:98
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show
Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!wetware!drieux
From: [e-mail] (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Anyone for Article 92, 133, 134?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Usenet News Account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: vladimir
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 21:57:36 GMT
Lines: 62

[e-mail] (Michael P Noonan) writes:
] In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (drieux, just drieux) writes:
] |> [e-mail] (Michael P Noonan) writes:
] |> ] In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (drieux, just drieux) writes:
] |> ] |> [e-mail] (Paul Lebow) writes:
] |> ] |> ]
] |> ] |> ] What's the problem?  Most
] |> ] |> ] would gladly accept that label.  Unless, of course, you're just a wee bit
] |> ] |> ] uneasy with the concept of abortion.  A hint of concsience maybe?
] |> ] |>
] |> ] |> Just thought I would ask,
] |> ] |> or is this too a matter of conscience?
] |> ]
] |> ] I wouldn't use napalm myself, but I'm for the rights of others to use it.
] |> ] So I guess I'm pro-choice.  ;->
] |>
] |> Is this an Awareness of MoralGuilt Creeping OUT?
] |>
] |> Its Not that you want to Use Napalm, but you will
] |> allow others to use it......
] |>
] |> Why Not come Right out and Admit that Latently You
] |> are AntiMilitary, and Want to Dehumanize All Vets,
] |> and deprive them of a Primary Defensive Mechanism....
]
] I din't respond to this initially since I thought it was a form of
] sarcasm and I wasn't sure if I was really being insulted or not.
]
] I am an officer in the military, sir.  My comment was meant to
] point out what I perceive to be an inconsistancy in belief with
] those pro-choicers who believe that abortion is wrong, but they
] feel that they have no right to lobby for legislation against it.
] That is, I believe that if something is wrong for me, it is wrong
] for others as well.


Minor Point of Logical Contention here:

What are your opinions, in light of your,
It stands for all approach, to the minor
matter of the above stipulated UCMJ articles.

Either You have just asserted that You wish
all to be under the obligations of said stipulated
articles, or You have just stipulated that you are
in direct violation of them by opposing them.

If You are any man of Honor, then to follow
your Code, you are Obliged to resign your
commission and seek other employment!

Please make a  bid, call, or fold.

ciao
drieux


--
Modern Day Problems:

"lets get linear, I want to get linear, linear"
                Olivia Newton Algegra