home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: still more of the GROUP, kevin darcy
- Message-ID: <1993Jan6.133324.14160@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1993Jan4.051222.15504@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan4.132008.12165@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1993Jan6.055952.24965@rotag.mi.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 13:33:24 GMT
- Lines: 77
-
- In article <1993Jan6.055952.24965@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- }In article <1993Jan4.132008.12165@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
- }>In article <1993Jan4.051222.15504@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- }>}In article <1993Jan3.162045.18984@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
- }>}>In article <1993Jan3.142319.12078@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org
- }>}>(Kevin Darcy) writes:
-
- }>}>}I have never argued affirmatively for restrictions on abortion, Mark.
- }>}>}Deal with it as best you can.
-
- Uh, you have said you don't like absolutes, certainly where abortion
- is concerned. You have disagreed with the statement that there
- should be absolutely no restrictions on abortion. Does not that
- disagreement imply that you argue in the affirmative for restrictions
- on abortion? Deal with it as best you can. I'm certain it will include
- either some type of denial or you will claim that somehow it isn't the
- same and doesn't matter...
-
- Of course, you might just ignore it also.
-
- }>}Do you believe everything that Keegan tells you, without even bothering to
- }>}check out the facts for yourself, Galen?
- }>
- }>No, I read the article myself. But now that you ask, if Keegan were to
- }>assert that the earth was edible, and you were to say it was made of
- }>rocks and dirt and other stuff that was inedible, I would probably take
- }>a bite.
- }
- }I'd trust my OWN judgment long before I resorted to such behavior...
- }
- }Galen, are you _really_ so insecure in your beliefs that you'd start chomping
- }dirt just because of a silly disagreement between two guys on the Net?
-
- Yeah, it would be a bit stupid, if that were the case, but it isn't. I
- said that I would eat it if you, Kevin Darcy, said that the earth was
- inedible. An assertion like that from anyone else might give me
- some pause, but coming from you, it would be entirely different.
- There are a few other people on the net that would rather insist
- they are right than actually be right. The name Peter Niykos comes
- quickly to mind. But no one has elevated it to the "art" that
- you have Kevin. My impression of you has not been created over
- this most recent disagreement we have had in talk.abortion. Rather,
- it has been formed over years of witnessing your rather bizarre
- behavior in several many groups on the net. Sometimes you say
- good things, I'll grant you that, but other times you say some
- really off the wall things, and then steadfastly defend them, no
- matter how ridiculous your subsequent statements.
-
- I'm not the only one who has noticed this behavior, either. It
- seems like I run into one of your meta-discussions with someone
- else all too frequently. More often than not, it seems that you
- spend much of your time protesting that you haven't said what
- you have, or you didn't mean it that way. You hide behind
- things like context, definitions, spelling, etc. in a way
- that boggles the mind, all the while asserting that
- calling people by the wrong name or whatever you do in error
- doesn't really matter anyway.
-
- You claim to have convictions, and that you only need be true
- to those convictions, and damn everything else. But on investigation,
- you are extremely hazy or vague as to what some of those convictions
- entail, or what they might mean. Oh, I imagine they seem clear
- to you, but you, above all others that I have seen, have great
- difficulty expressing them to others in a fashion that, to
- be rather charitable, is less than ambiguous.
-
- Kevin, you didn't enter the net with a reputation, you entered
- as everyone else with a tabula rasa. Face it, you have had to
- work very hard to earn your reputation. With some people I
- have to ask if they are a complete fool or just in training.
- I don't have to ask the question of you -- you teach.
-
-
- --
- hang gliding mailing list: hang-gliding-request@virginia.edu
- Galen Hekhuis UVa Health Sci Ctr (804)982-1646 gjh@virginia.edu
- Illiterate? Write for FREE help...
-