home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
- From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Documenting claims for Mark Cochran (Was: Proposed...FAQ)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.124850.10173@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 12:48:50 GMT
- References: <1993Jan5.020530.8271@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1384@blue.cis.pitt.edu> <1993Jan5.070455.20287@rotag.mi.org>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- Lines: 16
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
- Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise
-
- kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- -> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- -> >I've never seen Beth Bartley lie about anything on t.a. I find
- -> >her extremely credible.
- ->
- -> Do you believe her informed claim that she is
- -> "pro-choice"?
-
- don't know about susan, but i think anyone who would
- ask if someone who openly supports anti-choice
- legislation (and who would go as far as imprisoning
- women who have abortions) as ms. bartley does is
- pro-choice is a complete and utter fool.
-
- i wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people considered
- you to be a complete and utter fool, kebbie.
-