home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: How moderation would work
- Message-ID: <1993Jan13.015437.22144@galois.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <m720wB1w165w@1776.COM>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 01:54:37 GMT
- Lines: 9
-
- In article <m720wB1w165w@1776.COM> bob@1776.COM (Robert Coe) writes:
- >There's been a lot said recently to the effect that the panel of moderators
- >would (or should) vote on whether to accept a particular article. Surely
- >that would be too cumbersome and slow!
-
- Indeed, I would never consent to moderate if I had to look at all
- articles. For one, I have other things to do. For two, I go on
- vacations now and then. I expect to discuss only the most problematic
- cases with other moderators, at least once things get going.
-