home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.physics:22566 news.groups:25401
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,news.groups
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!nic.umass.edu!risky.ecs.umass.edu!spock.ecs.umass.edu!trodrigu
- From: trodrigu@spock.ecs.umass.edu (Tao R or Stephen L)
- Subject: Re: sci.physics.research: Important unresolved issues!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.082756.21119@risky.ecs.umass.edu>
- Sender: usenet@risky.ecs.umass.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: spock.ecs.umass.edu
- Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- References: <MATT.93Jan10010325@physics2.berkeley.edu> <COLUMBUS.93Jan11100318@strident.think.com> <BCR.93Jan12002118@hfl3sn02.cern.ch>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 08:27:56 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In order to decide if I should worry about the "not even wrong" clause,
- I would be interested to know if any of the following topics are "not
- even wrong", based on content as described:
-
- 1) A theoretical claim that time will run backward near the end of the
- life of the universe.
- 2) The initial 'cold fusion' announcement.
- 3) A claim that 'red shift' appears to be quantized, and that this calls
- into question the prominent theories about the age of the universe.
- 4) A claim that the energy of a vacuum should be presumed to be zero
- unless proven otherwise.
-
- - Stephen Linhart
-
-