home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!newserver.jvnc.net!newsserver.technet.sg!nuscc!matmcinn
- From: matmcinn@nuscc.nus.sg (.)
- Subject: infinite universe
- Message-ID: <1993Jan6.034634.9304@nuscc.nus.sg>
- Organization: National University of Singapore
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
- References: <1993Jan5.043302.8774@nuscc.nus.sg>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 03:46:34 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- : tabitha@vms.huji.ac.il writes:
- : : Another question from a non-physicist.
- : :
- : : I frequently read that cosmologists debate whether the
- : : universe has infinite size. If the Big Bang started
- : : at a definite time in the past, and has since expanded
- : : at a finite speed, how can it be infinite? What am
- : : I missing?
- : :
- : : -dennis turner
- : : tabitha@vms.huji.ac.il
- : Think of it this way. Consider pythagoras' theorem for 3D space: it
- : involves an expression of the form x^2+y^2+z^2. This is for an infinite
- : space. Now replace this expression in pythagoras' theorem by the
- : following: t^2 [x^2+y^2+z^2] where t is time, and t>0. Then you have a
- : universe which is expanding, but which is still *infinitely large* for
- : all times t. The distance between any two given points tends to zero as t
- : tends to zero, but for any value of t one can always find two points
- : separated by an arbitrarily large distance. The "big bang" corresponds to
- : t=0, but notice that t=0 is not part of this model because we have t>0
- : with strict inequality.
- : To summarise: this example shows that the mere fact that the Universe is
- : of finite age does not allow us to conclude either that it is of finite
- : spatial extent or that it had a beginning.
- :
-