home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!minsky
- From: minsky@media.mit.edu (Marvin Minsky)
- Subject: Re: infinite universe
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.055613.18891@news.media.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@news.media.mit.edu (USENET News System)
- Cc: minsky
- Organization: MIT Media Laboratory
- References: <1993Jan4.184245.28970@novell.com> <1993Jan5.041650.7437@nuscc.nus.sg>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 05:56:13 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <1993Jan5.041650.7437@nuscc.nus.sg> matmcinn@nuscc.nus.sg (MAWENZI lieutenant of Kibo) writes:
- >dseeman@novell.com (Daniel Seeman) writes:
- >: On this very non-rigourous (even symplistic) level, there can be no boundary to
- > ^^^^^^^^^^^
- > This is my favourite neologism for 1993 so far.
-
- Yah. The word 'simplistic" reminds me of a good example of how to
- imagine something that is three-dimensional and finit, yet unbounded,
- namely by properly constructing 5 simplexes. A three-dimensional
- simplex (in topology) is simply a tetrahedron -- that is, a triangular
- pyramid. Here's the trick: Take a simplex A and then glue four more
- onto it by constructing an extra point above each of the four faces.
- Then each new point with the three face-points determine a new
- simplex.
-
- Now this 5-pyramid gadget has a lot of boundary, namely twelve
- triangles. However, these form six facing-pairs that each share an
- edge of the original simplex A. Fold them so that the face-pairs
- close. (When you do this, two of the new, external points may come
- together.) After all the six facing pairs are closed, there will
- remain no external boundary at all. All the four external points
- will have come together at a single point -- and that point will now
- be in the interior of the completed object!
-
- If you try to do this in three-dimensions (you're allowed, in
- topology, o stretch things any way you want, so long as you don't tear
- them) you'll find that you can't quit manage to close it all up at
- once -- but in four dimensions you'll find no difficulty at all to do
- it. Then you have what is called a "3-sphere".
-
- .
-
-