home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!wsu-cs!igor.physics.wayne.edu!atems
- From: atems@igor.physics.wayne.edu (Dale Atems)
- Subject: Re: Bell's inequality rules out hidden varibaiables? N O !
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.060842.10238@cs.wayne.edu>
- Sender: usenet@cs.wayne.edu (Usenet News)
- Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
- References: <1993Jan4.031311.6547@news.columbia.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 06:08:42 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1993Jan4.031311.6547@news.columbia.edu> sla7@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Seth Louber Antiles) writes:
- >People on this group seem to keep claiming that Bell's inequality
- >rules out hidden variables. They claim that non-locality is
- >incompatible with hidden variables.
-
- Which people? I've only read one post in the last few weeks where that
- claim was made, and it was quickly contradicted by someone who knew better.
- Maybe some of these articles aren't reaching my server.
-
- ------
- Dale Atems
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
- Department of Physics and Astronomy
- atems@igor.physics.wayne.edu
-