home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!sasghm
- From: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com (Gary Merrill)
- Subject: Re: Which theory before observation ?
- Originator: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
- Message-ID: <C0qw8o.1Hp@unx.sas.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:29:12 GMT
- References: <102936.2005.14241@kcbbs.gen.nz> <C0FssI.DtF@unx.sas.com> <schiller.726394556@hpas5> <C0HLqI.LA@unx.sas.com> <schiller.726487694@hpas5> <C0JHzq.H4o@unx.sas.com> <schiller.726741786@hpas5> <C0p53E.Iyp@unx.sas.com> <schiller.726827765@hpas5>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: theseus.unx.sas.com
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 12
-
-
- In article <schiller.726827765@hpas5>, schiller@prl.philips.nl (schiller c) writes:
-
- By the way, you haven't made any comment on the quotation on quarks
- I posted earlier concerning how it either is compatible or incompatible
- your view of fact and theory. Nor have you made a guess as to the
- source of the quotation. Care to try for both of these?
-
- --
- Gary H. Merrill [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]
- SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Dr. / Cary, NC 27513 / (919) 677-8000
- sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com ... !mcnc!sas!sasghm
-