home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!gjm11
- From: gjm11@cus.cam.ac.uk (G.J. McCaughan)
- Subject: Re: Frankly,my dear......was: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.171719.28657@infodev.cam.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: apus.cus.cam.ac.uk
- Organization: U of Cambridge, England
- References: <1ifdq3INNblv@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1993Jan7.021308.10566@nuscc.nus.sg>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:17:19 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1993Jan7.021308.10566@nuscc.nus.sg> matmcinn@nuscc.nus.sg (.)
- complains that Fermat's Last Theorem is boring, on the grounds that it's
- recreational mathematics, and claims that people are only interested in it
- because it's hard.
-
- A few comments:
-
- * It's pretty. If the only reason for being interested in any mathematical
- result is because it helps you prove other mathematical results, there's
- a bit of an infinite regress there. In my opinion, one of the main reasons
- for doing mathematics at all is its aesthetic appeal; and FLT *does* have
- aesthetic appeal.
-
- * It does connect with the rest of mathematics, anyway. Not just the algebraic
- geometry you say you've heard all the propaganda for, but other areas of
- number theory, to do with modular forms and the like.
-
- * "frankly, who cares? It's recreational mathematics, right?" Does the fact
- that something is "recreational" -- that people other than professional
- mathematicians are interested in it, in other words -- make it boring?
-
- * Work on FLT was one of the big motivators for the theory of ideals. I don't
- call that trivial, boring, or even "recreational".
-
- --
- Gareth McCaughan Dept. of Pure Mathematics & Mathematical Statistics,
- gjm11@cus.cam.ac.uk Cambridge University, England. [Research student]
-