home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!gatech!ukma!memstvx1!connolly
- From: connolly@memstvx1.memst.edu
- Newsgroups: sci.lang
- Subject: Re: Liquids to Fricatives and Vice Versa (was Re: Bulgarians - ...)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.081715.4859@memstvx1.memst.edu>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 08:17:15 -0600
- References: <1993Jan3.164904.6398@desire.wright.edu> <Jan.3.19.08.23.1993.201@pilot.njin.net> <1993Jan4.032130.12753@trl.oz.au> <9969@fs3.cam.nist.gov>
- Organization: Memphis State University
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <9969@fs3.cam.nist.gov>, koontz@cam.nist.gov (John E. Koontz X5180) writes:
- > In article <1993Jan4.032130.12753@trl.oz.au>, jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU (Jacques Guy) writes:
- > |> ... if memory serves, Latin r --> s.
- >
- > Sorry, it's the other way around, i.e., s > r (via z?) / V__V, cf.
- > genus (nom. sg.) vs. generis (gen. sg.) (example by memory, Latin not my
- > strength)
-
- Good enough, though. Essentially *all* intervocalic -s- in Latin became
- -r-. (-ss- was, of course, maintained, since neither -s- was intervocalic).
- The few examples of intervocalic -s- in classical Latin mainly reflect
- earlier -ss-, simplified after a long vowel. -ss-, in turn, mainly
- reflects /tt dt dht/, all of which may already have been assibilated
- in Indo-European.
-
- The opposite change, [r] to a sibilant, is rarer but does occur.
- French _chaise_ 'chair' (beside expected _chaire_ 'speaker's platform')
- < Gk. Lat. _cathedra_ is the classic example. Assibilation also occurs
- in some Slavic languages, where Polish <rz> represents [z^] deriving
- from earlier /r/ in certain environments and Czech <r^> is a "rolled
- post-alveolar fricative" deriving from earlier /r/.
-
- --Leo Connolly
-