home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!nuchat!kevin
- From: kevin@nuchat.sccsi.com (Kevin Brown)
- Subject: Re: Concern For Ozone Depletion Clear, Knowledge of CFCs Mostly
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.040519.22386@nuchat.sccsi.com>
- Organization: I can't see any in the immediate vicinity...
- References: <1992Dec29.202248.21173@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <1740@airgun.wg.waii.com> <1992Dec30.200115.24132@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 04:05:19 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1992Dec30.200115.24132@en.ecn.purdue.edu> ghg@en.ecn.purdue.edu (George Goble) writes:
- >In article <1740@airgun.wg.waii.com> miller@hmsp04.wg3.waii.com (Griff Miller X7114) writes:
- [...]
- >>To me, the cons of R-134a far outweigh the pros. It's ONLY advantage
- >>is that its ODF is 0. Why can't somebody use GHG12 or something similar
- >>in new cars? It's ODF is practically nil, yes?
- >
- >GHG ODF is 0.04 (per car), DuPont SUVA MP52 is around the same, but it
- >needs most of the oil and drier changed to new types. GHG needs no changes.
- >Both are a lot less hassle than a R-134a conversion. R-12 ODF is 1.0
-
- Since manufacturers are probably hell-bent on switching over to R-134a
- (whether of their own free will or by government coercion), how well do
- you think GHG will work in an R-134a setup? How well will propane/isobutane
- work? I don't anticipate the current auto A/C designs being around much
- longer, despite the obvious fact that they needn't be replaced...
-
- >--ghg
-
- P.S.: could you email me your information? Sounds fascinating.
-
-
- --
- Kevin Brown kevin@nuchat.sccsi.com
- This is your .signature virus: < begin 644 .signature (9V]T8VAA(0K0z end >
- This is your .signature virus on drugs: <>
- Any questions?
-