home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cc.utah.edu!beezer
- From: beezer@cc.utah.edu (BEEZER)
- Subject: Re: [QUESTION]: PUBLIC-KEYS (ETC) FOR PUBLIC BBS NETWORK
- Message-ID: <12JAN199312470550@cc.utah.edu>
- Summary: You're better off to do it yourself.
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1
- Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
- Organization: Salt Lick, UT
- References: <12JAN199300513143@cc.utah.edu> <1iun0sINN9f6@uwm.edu>
- Date: 12 Jan 1993 12:47 MST
- Lines: 13
-
-
- I understand clearly the advantage/need to encrypt before uploading,
- but 1) most users to this network won't d/l the s/w and spend so
- much time encrypting (currently incompatible with all off-line mail
- readers)...
-
- 2) The BBS/network will likely be more vulnerable to shut-down by
- feds than the post office is... ie. sending local/abroad drug
- trafficing via public access bbs/network would be an easy and
- expected abuse. In this case, the sysop sets himself up for
- owning and transmitting illegal material - although he doesn't
- know that, he should... shouldn't he?
-
-