home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:6685 alt.security.ripem:105
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.ripem
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!att-out!cbnewsh!cbnewsh.cb.att.com!wcs
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (Bill Stewart +1-908-949-0705)
- Subject: Re: Complete ITAR Available
- Organization: the best minds of a generation, destroyed by madness
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 05:57:18 GMT
- Message-ID: <WCS.93Jan12005718@rainier.ATT.COM>
- In-Reply-To: strnlght@netcom.com's message of Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:29:18 GMT
- References: <1993Jan10.215609.3109@convex.com> <1993Jan11.003432.15501@netcom.com>
- <CKD.93Jan10211803@loiosh.eff.org> <1993Jan11.172918.1521@netcom.com>
- Sender: news@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (NetNews Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rainier.ho.att.com
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1993Jan11.172918.1521@netcom.com> strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:
- In article <CKD.93Jan10211803@loiosh.eff.org> ckd@eff.org (Christopher
- Davis) writes:
- >that export of RIPEM would be legal, which would make it possible for those
- >both inside and outside the US and Canada to use it, and make it a
- >practical cross-border public-key encryption system.
-
- RSA's attorneys say not, at least with respect to RSAREF, which right now
- is an essential part of RIPEM. Let's leave it there instead of continuing
- to repeat ourselves.
-
- More precisely, RIPEM depends on having subroutines with the RSAREF interface
- which implement RSAREF functionality - RIPEM itself could be exported,
- and some of those sinister foreigners could reimplement RSAREF,
- as long as they stick to the interfaces, and then we could probably use RIPEM
- for cross-border mail (assuming key-certification issues can be resolved),
- without having to export RSAREF itself (which violates the RSAREF licenses,
- as well as inviting problems from the ITAR-vogons.)
-
- Has anybody read the RSAREF license carefully enough to determine
- whether the interface definitions can be distributed without license?
- (Doing so for the purpose of re-implementing RSAREF may disturb some people,
- but doing so for the purpose of building code that USES RSAREF would
- seem to be very much in the spirit of technology dissemination that
- the patent process is supposed to encourage.)
- If it's ok to distribute the interface, one could also contend that an
- interface definition isn't software, it's just documentation.
- --
- # Pray for peace; Bill
- # Bill Stewart 1-908-949-0705 wcs@anchor.att.com AT&T Bell Labs 4M312 Holmdel NJ
- Bush's pardon of his co-conspirators shows that he is, in the end, still a wimp.
-