home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!swrinde!network.ucsd.edu!qualcom.qualcomm.com!servo.qualcomm.com!karn
- From: karn@servo.qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
- Subject: Re: KH-11 pictures -
- Message-ID: <1993Jan9.000917.22206@qualcomm.com>
- Sender: news@qualcomm.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: servo.qualcomm.com
- Organization: Qualcomm, Inc
- References: <PCL.93Jan8095731@rhodium.ox.ac.uk> <1993Jan8.161139.8718@netcom.com> <9301081644.AA19208@TIS.COM>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 00:09:17 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <9301081644.AA19208@TIS.COM> mjr@TIS.COM writes:
- > Those pictures were from a KH-11. KH-11's are presumably
- >quite obsolete. We're talking a matter of years since those pictures
- >were published. If you extrapolate a little bit, based on the kinds
- >of advances in commercial electronic imaging that we've been seeing,
- >it's quite possible that far, far higher resolution pictures are
- >possible.
-
- You forget about the diffraction limit. What I found so interesting
- about those pictures was that their resolution (30cm) was just about
- exactly what I'd expect for an objective mirror just small enough to
- fit in the payload shroud of a Titan 3C, operating at visible light
- wavelengths from minimum orbital altitude. I.e., the KH-11 is already
- operating damn close to the theoretical limits. It's simply not
- possible to do better without getting closer and/or using a larger
- mirror. The laws of physics are the same for classified projects as
- they are for the rest of us.
-
- The only way to get closer is to use an airplane, since you just can't
- orbit satellites at arbitrarily low altitudes. And if they start
- flying larger objective mirrors, it'll be obvious from the enlarged
- payload shrouds. The only other way is to build deployable mirrors
- capable of accuracies of fractions of a wavelength. Given the severe
- thermal cycling in space, I think this is infeasible.
-
- For these and other reasons, I don't believe for a second that the
- Pentagon voluntarily retired the SR-71 in favor of satellites. I'm
- willing to bet that they had a new generation airplane already well in
- hand when they did that.
-
- Phil
-
-
-