home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- From: Owen.Lewis@purplet.demon.co.uk (Owen Lewis)
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!purplet!Owen.Lewis
- Subject: Re: PGP - Legal?
- Organization: FidoNet node 2:252/305 - The Purple Tentacle, Reading
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:24:00 +0000
- Message-ID: <26.2B4A0D75@purplet.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
- Lines: 23
-
- -=> Quoting David Sternlight to All <=-
-
-
- >Espionage? For obtaining unclassified information that is very widely
- >and readily available to anyone in the US?
-
- DS> .......... There are some things, for example, which can readily
- DS> be seen from "unclassified territory" that are a violation of the
- DS> law to photograph. They are enumerated by general category in the
- DS> Act.
-
- Tsk, tsk, David!
-
- What sort of red herring is 'unclassified territory'? What matters (in
- context) is whether or not the subject or subject's activity is government
- classified information that it is illegal to possess unless
- specifically authorised to do so. Not even your spectacular sophistries
- have yet conjured up Government classification for PGP. Come to think of
- it.......I wonder why ever not??
-
-
- ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.11
-
-