home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.autos.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!rsiatl!jgd
- From: jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond)
- Subject: Re: Oxygenated Gasoline and Low MPG (super unleaded?)
- Message-ID: <841r97b@dixie.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jan 93 06:45:49 GMT
- Organization: Dixie Communications Public Access. The Mouth of the South.
- References: <4278.88.uupcb@chaos.lrk.ar.us> <08zr4tg@dixie.com> <29443@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
- Lines: 121
-
- bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ron Bense) writes:
-
- >Shipping, actually, and to be more specific, the guys that inspect those
- >tankers that the oafs continue to ground. I imagine that their data
- >is a little more accurate than yours.
-
- Umm maybe so but I'll bet on my sources at API (American Petroleum Institute)
- over day labor on a loading dock.
-
- >>not being able to put out a fire, I've never heard such fairy tails.
-
- >That was one of their concerns.
-
- Not suprising. Hourly workers have all kinds of superstitions that
- can't be changed by any amount of fact. When I used to work in a
- heavy equipment crew, I knew many iron workers who believed green
- to be an unlucky color and would not work around a green crane.
- Color was one of their concerns. Do you assign any basis in fact to
- that?
-
- >>If you've ever extinguished an alcohol fire, you've extinguished a
- >>burning oxygenate. As to cancer, nothing is in the material
- >>safety data sheets I have that were current about 6 months ago.
-
- >Alcohol requires oxygen to burn. Something like Potassium Perchlorate
- >decomposes and yields extra oxygen. That's what I would call an oxygenate,
- >but no one has answered that yet, so I'll wait and see what occurs.
-
- Doesn't matter what you'd call an oxygenate. The term is used in
- the context of hydrocarbon fuels to refer to any molecule containing
- one or more oxygen atoms. The alcohols, MTBE, ETBE, TAME and a other
- ethers fit the category. If you think that ANY of these fuels can
- burn without oxygen and thus are hard to extinguish OR you believe
- that potassium perchlorate or any other oxidizer is blended into
- pump gas, then, well... I have some nice seafront property to sell...
-
- >>The stuff is not aimed at your new, closed loop car. It is aimed
- >>at older cars, particularly those whose engines were tuned a bit
- >>rich to work with AIR injection and one way catalysts.
-
- >Then just increase emission standards, and make the minimum amount for
- >spending in one year at least equal to the price of a catalytic converter.
- >Another good one would be to ban the car off the road if it fails to
- >meet emmissions 2 years in a row until it does meet them.
-
- Comment a: I don't set policy, I just report on it.
-
- Comment b: That will never happen because it would cost "poor people"
- money and would not be "progressive".
-
- >>Fuel economy has nothing to do with performance. Naturally your mileage
- >>would go down as your engine's ECU compensates for the leanness. If you
- >>ran pure methanol whose stochiometric ratio is 6:1, your mileage
- >>would go through the floor.
-
- >1.) Fuel economy and performance generally go hand in hand, an increase
- >in one causes a decrease in the other. Both of mine decreased.
-
- No they don't. If you change fuels so the mixture is lean under most
- conditions, you will make less power because of less than optimum
- power AND your economy will decrease because you open the throttle
- more to compensate for the loss of power. If you don't believe that,
- look in any elementary engine text and observe a brake specific fuel
- consumption vs mixture graph.
-
- >2.) I believe the specific energy of methanol is lower than gasoline,
- >requiring more to be burned for same horsepower, resulting in lower
- >fuel economy.
-
- Specific energy is almost the same for alcohol and gasoline:
-
- Gasoline 2.92
- methanol 3.08
- Ethanol 3.00
-
- The issues are
-
- oxygen content:
-
- Gasoline 0 % by weight
- Methanol 50.0
- Ethanol 34.8
-
- Heating value
-
- Gasoline 42.7 MJ/kg
- Methanol 19.9
- Ethanol 26.8
-
- Stoichiometric ratio (derived from oxygen content)
-
- Gasoline 14.6:1
- Methanol 6.45:1
- Ethanol 9.0:1
-
- Reference: "Automotive Fuels Handbook", Owens & Coley, Tbl 12.3, P267
-
- >3.) I base the above on the fact that propane powered cars run about
- >1.8:1 compared to gas in fuel economy, and the knowledge that power
- >also drops in these vehicles. (Emissions were said to much better, though.
- >Maybe all older cars should be forced to convert to either modern engine
- >emissions or propane?)
-
- The economy difference between propane and gasoline is due to the different
- density and molecular weight of the fuels and thus the difference in
- the number of fuel atoms per gallon of fuel. Propane does NOT produce
- less power than gasoline. Propane's slight loss in volumetric efficiency
- due to its being introduced as a gas instead of a liquid is more than
- offset by its high octane. When the engine is tuned for propane (NOT
- duel fuel, add-on conversions), it makes as much power as a gas motor.
- I've built propane-powered turbocharged 280Z engines that made quite enough
- power, thank you. (actually not, since there is no such thing as enough
- power but enough to dust the porches and 'vettes.)
-
- John
- --
- John De Armond, WD4OQC |Interested in high performance mobility?
- Performance Engineering Magazine(TM) | Interested in high tech and computers?
- Marietta, Ga | Send ur snail-mail address to
- jgd@dixie.com | perform@dixie.com for a free sample mag
- Need Usenet public Access in Atlanta? Write Me for info on Dixie.com.
-