home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!sgigate!sgi!mips!vermont.mti.sgi.com!jackc
- From: jackc@vermont.mti.sgi.com (Jack Choquette)
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.misc
- Subject: Re: SF fans show libertarian inclination
- Message-ID: <1iaos1INNmf0@spim.mti.sgi.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 01:39:13 GMT
- References: <725750803snz@keris.demon.co.uk> <1i9mnnINNgvn@transfer.stratus.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
- Lines: 33
- NNTP-Posting-Host: vermont.mti.sgi.com
-
- In article <1i9mnnINNgvn@transfer.stratus.com>, jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann) writes:
- |> But of course live and let live is not all there is to
- |> libertarianism. If that's all it was, a lot more of us would
- |> probably fall into the category. Too much of libertarianism
- |> is also "if they can't work, let them starve, but don't make
- |> me spend my tax money on them."
- |>
- |> --
- |> Jim Mann
- |> Stratus Computer jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com
-
-
- But that all there is to libertarianism: "Live and let live". Taken
- to its extreme logical conclusion, it also means: "if they can't work
- {**and no one is willing to support them**}, let them starve, but
- don't make me {**i.e. force me**} support them.
-
- Notice that I slightly modified your quote, specifically note the text
- added between the {** **}. It is the most often omitted when
- explaining the libertarian mindset, but is the most crucial bit needed
- to understand libertarianism.
-
- Libertarianism is not against charity (although some people who are
- libertarians are against it). Libertarianism is against FORCED
- charity. Each person decides what is important to him/her and
- what s/he will support.
-
- If you feel it is important to support some charity, you may. Just do
- not FORCE others to do the same. If you will not do it unless
- everyone else also does it, then maybe you should look more closely
- at your own motives.
-
- /jack
-